bw3604
Station Staff
Posts: 10
|
Post by bw3604 on May 4, 2017 20:58:26 GMT
Be advised for those of you planning on buying the LTH C, 38 stock is the SAME model that comes with the IOW, therefore expect nothing new, couplings aren't properly configurated, when decoupling a consist with 7 carriages (DT+T+T+DT+T+T+DT), it will launch your coach up in the air when decoupling the trailer from the driving trailer. I've had a ton of headaches configurating some of my models, and this people releases their content without even doing a decouple testing! Not testing to the max your own creations is a requirement to become payware? Cause if it is, then I should start doing payware content instead of fixing minor details in my trains
Poor set of sounds, headlight has no physical button even though in the manual it says that it does, but instead you need to use a set of keys to turn them on (CTRL+SHIFT+5/6)...
You had only ONE job!
|
|
|
Post by holzroller on May 4, 2017 23:02:50 GMT
As the IOW stock only has the DM and no T you are not quite correct about the model being the same. The MS or T is a completely new model. The front of the cab is also different. I would suggest posting in the UKTS thread, where the model author for the 38 stock has posted, or submit a ticket to DTG if you have issues. Regarding sounds he has already stated that new sounds were too expensive for what was intended to be a budget model. He no longer works for DTG, this was a model he made in his spare time, it also has completely new scripts, from David Brindley and Meshtools. So, maybe based on the IOW stock, but not the same. Couplings, well I doubt DTG expected it to be uncoupled, it hasn't been done on the underground for many decades, even 38 stock ran in fixed formation for years. They are mostly artists, not railway experts, but let them know, they might fix it next year. More likely a community fix will come first.
|
|
bw3604
Station Staff
Posts: 10
|
Post by bw3604 on May 4, 2017 23:19:41 GMT
As the IOW stock only has the DM and no T you are not quite correct about the model being the same. The MS or T is a completely new model. The front of the cab is also different. I would suggest posting in the UKTS thread, where the model author for the 38 stock has posted, or submit a ticket to DTG if you have issues. Regarding sounds he has already stated that new sounds were too expensive for what was intended to be a budget model. He no longer works for DTG, this was a model he made in his spare time, it also has completely new scripts, from David Brindley and Meshtools. So, maybe based on the IOW stock, but not the same. Couplings, well I doubt DTG expected it to be uncoupled, it hasn't been done on the underground for many decades, even 38 stock ran in fixed formation for years. They are mostly artists, not railway experts, but let them know, they might fix it next year. More likely a community fix will come first. When I'm speaking about the "model", I'm refering to the 3D model itself. As always, community will come to the rescue. Btw, even though it ran in fixed formations, I'm pretty sure that it had a lot of uncoupling or coupling in several operations, such as shunt movements, removing part of the trainset, etc... So yeah. What's the name of the author btw? Obviously I ain't criticising the original author as it ain't his fault, and his model was a great release at the time, problem here is DTG.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 7, 2017 11:42:05 GMT
When I'm speaking about the "model", I'm refering to the 3D model itself. Since the BR class 483 and LU 1938 stock are pretty much the same train what exactly were you expecting in terms of model changes? But anyway, I disagree - as someone who has compared them I think quite a lot of improvements have been made to the model. If it was just a reskin then we wouldn't have the new indicator lights on the front and it is also quite clear that other model details have been improved both inside and out. To suggest to people to expect nothing new is inaccurate and a little disrespectful to the person who put the work in to the many changes that can be found in the 1938 variant both in terms of model changes, texturing and scripting.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 7, 2017 18:02:26 GMT
When I'm speaking about the "model", I'm refering to the 3D model itself. Since the BR class 483 and LU 1938 stock are pretty much the same train what exactly were you expecting in terms of model changes? But anyway, I disagree - as someone who has compared them I think quite a lot of improvements have been made to the model. If it was just a reskin then we wouldn't have the new indicator lights on the front and it is also quite clear that other model details have been improved both inside and out. To suggest to people to expect nothing new is inaccurate and a little disrespectful to the person who put the work in to the many changes that can be found in the 1938 variant both in terms of model changes, texturing and scripting. they could of tried to use more high quality sounds for the 38 but apart from that I love the visuals and If only they could add better psychics
|
|